EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/001182_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Thu Oct 19 23:02:19 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA029508939; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 23:02:19 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from raindrop (raindrop.ranma.com) by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA029448935; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 23:02:15 -0700
Received: by raindrop.ranma.com (Amiga SMTPpost 1.04 December 9, 1994)
        id AA01; Thu, 19 Oct 95 22:48:23
From: [e-mail] (Mike Harlock)
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Subject: Why don't lense flares show up in Alpha channel saves?
X-Mailer: //\\miga Electronic Mail (AmiElm 5.42)
To: [e-mail]
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 95 22:48:23
Organization: Raindrop Graphics
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Subject says it all.   I have a scene only containing a lense flare,
which eventually gets bright enough to wash the whole scene.
it will be used as an effects transition down the road in an non-linear
editor.

Should I just self-key it with a 0 saturation render?  I rendered it
against black, of course, so perhaps it's own transparency is what it needs.

--Mike

       __
      <  \      [e-mail] - Mike Harlock
[\\\\\\(\ (:::<======================================-
\<      >  \       Practice Random Kindness
 \\    /    |    And Senseless Acts of Beauty
  `==='____/


--
[e-mail] (Mike Harlock) sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]